No dismissal Fibertel Fibertel Expiration issued by the union government has shaken the television. The resolution adopted open a question mark over the continued employment of workers and their future working conditions.
Clarín That works as a state without law, workers have always known, in 13-TN Canal continues prohibited re-entry of the two delegates dismissed in 2008, despite court rulings that ordered the monopoly placing in the charge.
AGR In panel, bid farewell to all its internal committee 2004. The same in Clarín, Olé with a hundred workers, ten years ago. Back in the '90s, laid off and denied entry to another delegate.
It should be noted that the absorption of Fibertel by Cablevision, and of both by Clarín passed before a blind eye to all the "bodies control" of the Kirchner government.
The government now agreed Fibertel illegal. But for the benefit of other monopolies, "friends" of government. We refer to Telefonica and Telecom.
also K Werthein group that has control of content in Telecom C5N owns with Daniel Hadad. In this cable channel, low wages, unfair dismissal and bullying against staff are common. Any attempt at union organization among workers of the press is paid to the prosecution and dismissal.
In recent joint television, the greatest beneficiaries of the agreement, with a six-month loan at zero rate on the retention of the "first rise" of workers were Cablevision and Supercanal (Clarín is part of the shareholder last).
In this picture, it is necessary to clarify the role of union leadership (SAT), brought a resolution shows "concern" about the fate of workers may be at Cablevision.
SATSA But the contradiction is in the staunchly support the new Media Law, which is not simply the benefit of the national government to Telecom and Telefonica, which are aligned to it.
television workers we are at a crossroads: if workers lose the most important company, it appears the tendency to self-emptying into the guild. To deal with the layoffs, we need a union independent of government and business.
From Fiber Workers, our hypothesis is that Fibertel continue with their activities, not under the direction of Cablevision, Clarín but under management comprising representatives of its workers, political and social organizations and workers recognized television.
addition to the defense of all jobs and the full exercise of trade union rights and labor rights of workers.
punishment to all employers in the media that violates the rights of workers and staff and constituents who must enforce the law.
In this way, we will place a limit on extortion that Clarin, on the one hand, and pro-government media monopolies, on the other hand, workers have on television and public opinion. And we will open a debate on the right to work and freedom of expression, which require a struggle against private or state capitalist monopoly of media and communication.
Fiber Workers Association
0 comments:
Post a Comment